Green v. Prince Metallic Paint Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 49, Jan. T., 1904, by defendant, from decree of C. P. Carbon Co., Oct. T., 1902, No. 1, on bill in equity in case of Richard Green v. Prince Metallic Paint Company. Bill in equity for an injunction. The facts appear by the opinion of the Superior Court and by Green v. Prince Metallic Paint Co. (No. 1), ante, p. 415. Error assigned was the decree of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rice, P. J.,
The proceedings in this ease up to the entering of the decree *420of July 13,1903, are recited in our opinion disposing of the appeal from that decree. At an argument court held after that appeal was taken and the writ of certiorari delivered to the prothonotary of the court below, the appellee’s counsel called up for argument the exceptions to the judge’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. The appellant’s counsel not being prepared to argue them at that time, a later day was fixed by the court, and as he was engaged in another' court on that day the court again…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hovey v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Ewing v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862
- New Brighton & New Castle Railroad v. Pittsburgh, Youngstown & Chicago RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
- Berryhill v. WellsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1812
- Wampler v. ShisslerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Waynesburg Borough's North WardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905