Legal Opinion

Alflen v. McClenaghan

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 28, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevine, J.

There is but one important inquiry-presented in this proceeding. It relates to the question whether a personal judgment can be recovered by a cross-petitioner in a foreclosure suit, when such cross-petitioner is the holder of a note and mortgage on the same land upon which the plaintiff is seeking to foreclose.

It appears that the plaintiff in error, Gertrude Alflen, was the holder of a note against the original defendant, which note was secured by a second mortgage upon certain land. Said note and mortgage had been executed by a codefendant, W. J. McClenaghan, now one of the defendants in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Montpelier Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  2. Aldrich v. FriedmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marion Development Co. v. BruceOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Wenneman v. DanielsOhio Court of Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API