Hinson v. First National Bank
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Justice.
The defendant J. B. Hinson, plaintiff in error here, contends the venue provision of Code Ann. § 37-608 is unconstitutional.
The defendant was an endorser of the note and the action was brought in the county where the maker of the note (J. B. Paul Hinson) resided. The Georgia Constitution provides: “Suits against the maker and endorser of promissory notes ... or like instruments, residing in different counties, shall be brought in the county where the maker or acceptor resides.” Art. VI, Sec. XIV, Par. V (Code Ann. § 2-4905); Code § 3-205. Hence, venue of this case is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- South Georgia Natural Gas Co. v. Georgia Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Cone v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Jackson v. SappSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Daniels v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
3Cited by15 opinions
- SONS OF CONFEDERATE VETERANS v. HENRY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS (Two Cases)Supreme Court of Georgia · 2022
- St. John's Melkite Catholic Church v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Fulton County v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Ivey-Matherly Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Oglethorpe Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.