Legal Opinion

Baldridge v. Continental Airlines Holdings, Inc. (In Re Continental Airlines Holdings, Inc.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware

Decided October 12, 2000No. 19-10549Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION 1

MARY F. WALRATH, Bankruptcy Judge.

The issue before the Court is whether the Plaintiffs’ claims are limited by 11 U.S.C. § 502(b)(7). We hold that they are and, consequently, deny the Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment.

I. JURISDICTION

This Court has jurisdiction over these proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334 and 157(b)(1), (b)(2)(A), (B) and (O).

II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 2

On February 23, 1986, Eastern Airlines (“Eastern”) and the Air Lines Pilots Association (“the Pilots’ Union”) 3 ratified a collective bargaining agreement (“the CBA”), which included the Labor Protective…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API