ARUP Laboratories v. Pacific Medical Laboratory
District Court, D. Utah
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION ARUP LABORATORIES, INC., MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO Plaintiff, AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER TO REOPEN FACT DISCOVERY v. (DOC. NO. 64) PACIFIC MEDICAL LABORATORY, Case No. 2:20-cv-00186 INC., Judge David Barlow Defendant. Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg Before the court is Defendant Pacific Medical Laboratory, Inc.’s (“PML”) Motion to Amend Scheduling Order to Reopen Fact Discovery, (“Mot.,” Doc. No. 64). Plaintiff ARUP Laboratories, Inc. (“ARUP”) opposes the motion. (Opp’n, Doc. No. 68.) For the reasons…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Abdulhaseeb v. CalboneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Utah Republican Party v. HerbertCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017