In re Muskoka Lumber Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
In Bankruptcy. , On review of decision of referee.
1Opinion of the Court
HAZEL, District Judge.
The present bankruptcy act requires strict notification of the various steps in bankruptcy to be given the creditor, and that, tire provision of law not being complied with, the discharge of the bankrupt is not effective in an action upon his claim brought by a creditor who has not received such notice. The question here is whether a creditor who has not received the required notice, and who, within such period, had no knowledge of the bankruptcy, may, after the expiration of one year after adjudication, and before distribution of the estate by the trustee, prove his…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bray v. CobbDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1900
- In re MoebiusDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1902
- In re BkownDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1903
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re MeyerDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1910
- In re QuineDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1941
- In re EdelenDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1918
- Morganstern v. TulchinCity of New York Municipal Court · 1931
- In re Perpetual Building & Loan Ass'n, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1936