Legal Opinion

Hyundai Motor America v. National Union Fire Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 5, 2010No. 19-35058PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRABER, Circuit Judge:

After Plaintiff Hyundai Motor America (“Hyundai”) placed certain features on its website, a third party sued Hyundai for patent infringement. Hyundai sought a defense from its liability insurers, Defendants National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh and American Home Assurance Company. Because the alleged patent infringement concerned one of Hyundai’s advertising methods, Hyundai concluded that the third-party suit alleged an “advertising injury,” as that term is defined in the insurance policy. Defendants disagreed and declined to defend Hyundai, which defended…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Foster-Gardner, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Vestar Development Ii, Llc, an Arizona Limited Liability v. General Dynamics Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Everest and Jennings, Inc. v. American Motorists Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. MV TRANSP.California Supreme Court · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Dish Network Corp. v. Arch Specialty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  2. Mass. Bay Ins. Co. v. Walflor Indus., Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
  3. Teleflex Medical Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. Air Engineering, Inc. v. Industrial Air Power, LLCCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013
  5. Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API