Legal Opinion
United States v. Jose Jesus Madrigal, Also Known as Fat Boy
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 5, 1998No. 97-3130PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.
After a jury trial, Jose Jesus Madrigal was convicted of conspiracy to possess and distribute controlled substances, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846 (1994), promoting and facilitating an unlawful business activity involving controlled substances, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1952 and 2 (1994), and using a communication device to cause and facilitate possession with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(b) (1994). On appeal, Madrigal raises several evidentiary issues and asserts that the District Court erred in denying his motion…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Constance Haas Meester, Jeanne Sanfratello Tumulty, Robert Haas, Edward Conrad SawyerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. BoldenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. SturdivantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Rossi Garrison, United States of America v. Isaac Pike, United States of America v. Natasha BateyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Ramon Guel, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.