Legal Opinion

State v. Parnoff

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 3, 2018No. SC 19588PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtD'Auria, J.

**388The defendant, Laurence V. Parnoff, uttered threatening words to two water company employees who had entered his property pursuant to an easement to service a fire hydrant-telling them, essentially, that if they did not leave his property, he would retrieve a gun and shoot them. As a result of his statement, the defendant was convicted after a jury trial of disorderly conduct in violation of General Statutes § 53a-182 (a) (1), which criminalizes intentionally or **389recklessly causing inconvenience, annoyance, or alarm by way of "violent, tumultuous or threatening behavior ...." The…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Texas v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. United States v. AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Davis v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
  2. Haughwout v. TordentiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
  3. State v. BillingsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
  4. State v. RobertsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
  5. State v. TaverasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API