Legal Opinion

Barfield v. Brogdon

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 16, 1978No. 8827PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*789ROBINSON, Chief Justice.

The trial court entered judgment for defendant on a jury verdict on his cross-claim for actual and exemplary damages for wrongful sequestration. Affirmed subject to a remittitur.

Plaintiff, Robert E. Barfield, an attorney, took his lawn mower to Profitt’s Lawn Mower Service owned by defendant, J. Darrell Brogdon, for a tune-up. Barfield testified that the price of the tune-up was agreed to be $14.00. Brogdon testified that (1) the agreed price was $14.50 plus the cost of parts; (2) he wrote “14.50 plus parts” on the repair order in the presence of Mr. Barfield; and (3)…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Allen v. American National Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co. v. FriendCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. First Security Bank & Trust Co. v. RoachCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. NeumanTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Hamlett v. CoatesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ward v. Shriro Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. Callaway v. East Texas Government Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Barfield v. BrogdonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API