Neal v. Ellis
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM KNOX. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Knox County •to the Court of Civil Appeals, and by certiorari to the Court 'of Civil Appeals from the Supreme Court.— Will D. Weight, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Neil
This ease stands upon hill and demurrer. The chancellor sustained the demurrer and dismissed the hill and, on appeal to the court of civil appeals, his decree was affirmed. The case is now before us cn the writ of certiorari.
The hill alleged that the defendant Ellis, while indebted to insolvency, on or about the 24th day of August, 1916, colluded with his codefendant, ITazen, Trent & Harrell Company, for the purpose of evading the provisions of chapter 133 of the acts of 1901, entitled “An act to provide the terms updn which sales in hulk of stocks of merchandise, or of any portion thereof…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Bowdon v. BowdonTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
- Petway v. HooverCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1931
- In Re Waverly Acc. of Feb. 22-24, 1978District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1979
- Florow v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1979