Legal Opinion

Burrus Feed Mills, Inc. v. Reeder

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 17, 1965No. 7467PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAPMAN, Justice.

This is a products liability case tried to a jury upon the theory adopted by the trial court to the effect that the rule of ■“implied warranty” as announced by our Supreme Court in Decker & Sons v. Capps, 139 Tex. 609, 164 S.W.2d 828, 142 A.L.R. 1479, has application to food - mixed and processed by the manufacturer and sold for immediate consumption by animals.

The Decker case announced the principle that a non-negligent processor could be held liable in damages to a person injured from eating contaminated food prepared by such processor, although there was no privity of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Watkins v. JunkerTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Jacob E. Decker & Sons, Inc. v. CappsTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Carter v. Yardley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  5. Randy Knitwear, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rourke v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Hoover and Son v. OM Franklin Serum CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Chandler v. Anchor Serum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  4. O. M. Franklin Serum Co. v. C. A. Hoover & SonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  5. Fenno v. Jacobe, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API