Legal Opinion

United States v. Flarida

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 26, 2004No. 02-50065; D.C. No. CR-98-00152-GLT-01PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Robert James Flarida appeals his jury conviction and 121-month sentence for mail fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1341, wire fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1343, and money laundering, 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(A)(i), arising out of his role in a telemarketing scheme that targeted elderly individuals. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Flarida first argues that the district court erred by instructing the jury that no specific statements or omissions were necessary to support a finding of a “scheme to defraud.” In a published opinion concerning Flarida’s co-defendants, we rejected…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. United States v. Francisco Javier Alvarez, A.K.A. Frank Javier Alvarez, United States of America v. Richard ValenzuelaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. SarnoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. William Dennis Danielson v. United States v. William Dennis DanielsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Flarida, AKA Stone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Mitrione v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. United States v. FlaridaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API