United States v. Flarida
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Robert James Flarida appeals his jury conviction and 121-month sentence for mail fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1341, wire fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1343, and money laundering, 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(A)(i), arising out of his role in a telemarketing scheme that targeted elderly individuals. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Flarida first argues that the district court erred by instructing the jury that no specific statements or omissions were necessary to support a finding of a “scheme to defraud.” In a published opinion concerning Flarida’s co-defendants, we rejected…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. Francisco Javier Alvarez, A.K.A. Frank Javier Alvarez, United States of America v. Richard ValenzuelaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. SarnoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. William Dennis Danielson v. United States v. William Dennis DanielsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Flarida, AKA Stone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Mitrione v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. FlaridaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005