Cooke v. Cooke & Cole Silk Co.
New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau
1Opinion of the Court
The following in substance are the undisputed facts developed by the evidence: On April 15th, 1939, and for nineteen years prior thereto, James Cooke, the petitioner herein, was regularly employed by the respondent at its plant in Paterson, Flew Jersey, as a silk twister, receiving for his said services wages at the rate of forty dollars ($40) per week. In addition thereto he served as one of the officers of the respondent-corporation in the capacity of president, performing merely perfunctory and nominal services for which he received no remuneration. While his duties as a silk twister…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bernstein Furniture Co. v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- Guay v. Brown Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
- Wagner v. Lewis, New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau1935
3Cited by2 opinions
- Walsh v. KotlerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Walsh v. KotlerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956