Legal Opinion

Cooke v. Cooke & Cole Silk Co.

New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau

Decided September 16, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following in substance are the undisputed facts developed by the evidence: On April 15th, 1939, and for nineteen years prior thereto, James Cooke, the petitioner herein, was regularly employed by the respondent at its plant in Paterson, Flew Jersey, as a silk twister, receiving for his said services wages at the rate of forty dollars ($40) per week. In addition thereto he served as one of the officers of the respondent-corporation in the capacity of president, performing merely perfunctory and nominal services for which he received no remuneration. While his duties as a silk twister…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bernstein Furniture Co. v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  2. Guay v. Brown Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
  3. Wagner v. Lewis, New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Walsh v. KotlerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  2. Walsh v. KotlerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API