Legal Opinion
Talmadge v. Respess
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 21, 1997No. A96A1698, A96A1699PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ruffin, Judge.
These two appeals concern seven promissory notes executed by Herman Talmadge, Jr., A. L. Gaynes, and Twelve Oaks Realty Company (“Twelve Oaks”) (collectively “the defendants”). Under the notes, the defendants promised to repay Edwin Respess various sums of money Respess loaned to them. Respess is now deceased, and the executors of his will (“Respess”) sued the defendants for money allegedly due under the notes. The trial court granted Respess summary judgment on the five notes attached to the complaint as Exhibits A, C, D, F, and G (“notes A, C, D, F, and G”) and denied Respess’…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- General Electric Credit Corp. v. BrooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Great American Builders, Inc. v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Jay Gleason Advertising Service, Inc. v. GleasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Avery v. WhitworthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
3Cited by5 opinions
- Radioshack Corp. v. Cascade Crossing II, LLCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- Griffin v. Associated PayphoneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Digby's, Inc. v. Emory UniversityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Heath v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Radioshack Corp. v. Cascade Crossing II, LLCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007