Legal Opinion

Consolidated Amusement Co. v. Jarrett

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1915Published

Appeal prom District Magistrate op Honolulu.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

WATSON, J.

Replevin by tbe appellant for certain office furniture and chattels alleged to bave been unlawfully taken and detained from it by tbe appellee, William P. Jarrett, high sheriff of tbe Territory of Hawaii. What tbe answer was does not appear from tbe record sent up, but in tbe briefs of both counsel for tbe appellant and appellee it is stated to bave been a general denial, which, under our practice (Sec. 2369, R. L. 1915) was *538no doubt sufficient to permit tbe defendant to sbow tbat he had taken the property as an officer upon process. See also Wells on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Adams v. HubbardMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Cassel v. Western Stage Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1861
  3. Bridges v. LaymanIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Ingersoll v. EmmersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1848

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API