Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Jones

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 22, 1933No. 7 Div. 198PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BROAVN, Justice.

The appellant’s contention here is that the deed executed by T. J. Wofford, Sr., to Martha Alice Jones on November 3, 1873, interpreted in the light of the rule in Shelley’s Case, which was abolished by the Code of-1852 (section 1304), vested in Mrs. Jones a fee-tail estate, which by virtue of the statute was converted into an estate in fee simple. Code 1923, § 6901. If this contention is sustained, the appellant, on the agreed case, was the owner of the entire title, and appellees have no interest therein, and the decree granting them relief must be reversed.

The language of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shuttle & Weaver Land & Improvement Co. v. BarkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Wilson v. AlstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  3. Boshell v. BoshellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. Wilson v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lusk v. BroylesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API