Legal Opinion

People v. Ladson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 1995PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Appellant claims that he was denied his statutory ready trial right (CPL 30.30) and, thus, that his indictment should be dismissed. His trial motion alleged in bare conclusory terms that "his [constitutional right to a speedy trial ha[d] been denied.” The People urged denial of the motion on the ground that there was no CPL 30.30 violation in that defendant was "absent” within the statutory exclusion period (see, CPL 30.30 [4] [c]). The People claimed defendant’s location was unknown and that he also…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. LuperonNew York Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. SigismundiNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. People v. ScottNew York Supreme Court · 2003
  4. People v. SigismundiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. People v. CampbellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API