Legal Opinion

Blomkest Fertilizer, Inc. v. Potash Corporation Of Saskatchewan, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 7, 1999No. 97-1330Published

1Opinion of the Court

176 F.3d 1055

1999-1 Trade Cases P 72,515

BLOMKEST FERTILIZER, INC.; Cobden Grain & Feed, on behalf

of themselves and all others similarly situated; Plaintiffs,

Hahnaman Albrecht, Inc.; John Peterson, doing business as

Almelund Feed & Grain; Laing-Gro Fertilizers,

Inc.; Plaintiffs--Appellants,

Clearbrook AG Service, Inc., on behalf of itself and all

others similarly situated; Reamford Liquid Fertilizer,

Inc., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated;

Tolley's, Inc., on behalf of itself and all others

similarly situated; Plaintiffs,

James River Farm Service, Inc., on behalf of itself and all

ot…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API