Legal Opinion
The Mayflower Insurance Company v. Roosevelt Osborne, Alice Roe Osborne and Rose Marie Osborne, a Minor
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 8, 1964No. 9057_1Published
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, District Judge.
Mayflower Insurance Company, plaintiff below, appeals from a summary judgment declaring that it is obligated, under an automobile liability policy issued to Alice Osborne, to pay any final judgment that may be recovered against her husband, Roosevelt Osborne, in tort actions filed against him in a Tennessee state court by her and her daughter, Rose Marie. The accident out of which the claims arose occurred in Kentucky, where a wife can sue her husband. The Osbornes reside in Virginia, where the pollicy in question was issued, covering a Chevrolet automobile which the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ArghyrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
- Finkle v. Western Automobile InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930
- National Surety Corporation v. L. E. Wells, Sr. v. R. Hopfe, and Ella Hopfe, and L. E. Wells, Jr., a MinorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Hunter v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.