Legal Opinion

Feingold v. S. S. Kresge Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 31, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bodine, J.

A woman, accompanied by her three-and-a-half-year-old son, went to the defendant’s store in Wood-bury to make a purchase of candy for him. The child while in the store was severely injured by the fall of a rack containing a display of pictures. The rack was a flimsy con trivance fastened neither to the floor or wall. There was no error in the submission of the case to the jury. Obviously, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applied. Law v. Morris, 102 N. J. L. 650. Judge Green defined the doctrine in Mumma v. Easton and Amboy Railroad, 73 Id.…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cleary v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  2. Farrier v. LevinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Lewin v. Ohrbach's, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  4. Galbraith v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  5. Barnard v. Trenton-New Brunswick Theatres Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API