Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Hartfield. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Healy

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 15, 1952No. 22127-22128_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRENNAN, District Judge.

This appeal questions the taxable status of the alleged overpayment by the taxpayers of income tax for the calendar year 1945. The facts are not complicated; the. issue of law is concise.

At the times pertinent here, George W.. Hartfield and Edwin E. Healy were officers, of the Hartfield-Healy Supply Company,. Inc., a New York corporation, and eacE was the owner of twenty-five of the fifty-two outstanding shares of stock. In 1945. the corporation was insolvent. During that, year there was paid by the corporation, as salary to each of the above named officers the sum of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. North American Oil Consolidated v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. United States v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Pittman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1950
  4. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Arrowsmith Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. VivianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  5. Fleischer v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Healy v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. United States v. Lesoine United States v. MarcusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  3. All Americas Trading Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
  4. Meyers v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953
  5. All Americas Trading Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API