Legal Opinion

Krystal Faye Potterf, et al. v. Drew F. Wessels, et al.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 26, 2026No. 1:26-cv-10860Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION KRYSTAL FAYE POTTERF, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 26-cv-10860 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman v. DREW F. WESSELS, et al., Defendants. __________________________________________________________________/ ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ JOINT MOTION FOR PREPARATION OF HEARING TRANSCRIPT AT GOVERNMENT EXPENSE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 753(f) (ECF No. 105) Plaintiffs Joshua Raymond Potterf (“Joshua”) and Krystal Faye Potterf (“Krystal”)[1] are criminal defendants in two separate criminal cases pending in two separate Michigan state courts.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Herbert Lee Wilson v. William Morris E.B. Freeman Milton Palmore Billy Gist Lester B. Jackson Sheron Howard Norbert Schasa, A.C. Gillis, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API