Legal Opinion

Palen v. Pierce

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1921No. File No. 4869PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lincoln County. Hon. Louis L. FrjJEGESR, Judge. Action by Charles Palen, against Charlotte Pierce, administratrix of the Estate of Willis Pierce, deceased, to recover damages for breach of an alleged lease of land. From a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPolley, P. J.

This action is brought to recover damages for the breach of an alleged lease of a quarter section of land. Verdict and judgment were for plaintiff, and from' such judgment and order denying a new trial, defendant appeals.

It is the contention of defendant; First, that no contract was entered into between the plaintiff and defendant; and, second, that the evidence is not sufficient to support the verdict.

The negotiations for the lease of the premises took place in August, 1918. Plaintiff and a friend of his called upon Pierce, the owner of the land,’ for the purpose of leasing the same for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Laabs v. SchollSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Weaver v. BauerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  2. In Re NelsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1991
  3. Knutson v. KnutsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Weaver v. BauerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Weaver v. BauerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API