Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bussell v. Bridges

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1902No. 3552PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Original Application for Mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

*269The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reavis, C. J.

Application for writ of mandate. The petition, in substance, states that on January 27, 1900, lots 1 to 14, inclusive, in block 77, Seattle tide lands, were duly advertised for sale, and at said sale the highest and best bid was made by Daniel Kelleher; that the report of said sale was duly filed with the board of state land commissioners on January 30, 1900; that on March 31, 1900, and before the expiration of the thirty days provided by law for the issuance of the contract under said sale, petitioner filed in the office of the board an…

2Cited by25 opinions

  1. Phez Co. v. Salem Fruit UnionOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Cranston v. West Coast Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Simpson v. First Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Stringham v. Mutual Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Holmes v. WolfardOregon Supreme Court · 1905

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API