Legal Opinion

Trosper v. Bag 'N Save

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 2007No. S-05-889Published

1Opinion of the Court

273 Neb. 855

KIMBERLEE TROSPER, APPELLANT,

v.

BAG 'N SAVE, APPELLEE.

No. S-05-889.

Supreme Court of Nebraska.

Filed July 6, 2007.

Michael P. Dowd, of Dowd, Howard & Corrigan, L.L.C., for appellant.

Robert F. Rossiter, Jr., and Sherman P. Willis, of Fraser, Stryker, Meusey, Olson, Boyer & Bloch, P.C., for appellee.

HEAVICAN, C.J., WRIGHT, CONNOLLY, GERRARD, STEPHAN, McCORMACK, and MILLER-LERMAN, JJ.

CONNOLLY, J.

Under Nebraska law, an employer, without incurring liability, generally may terminate an at-will employee at any time. But in Jackson v. Morris Communications Corp.,[1] we held a public policy…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Tara C. Galabya v. New York City Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API