Matter of Estate of Nation
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Dissent
OPALA, Chief Justice,
with whom
HODGES, Vice Chief Justice, joins, dissenting.
The court dismisses for untimeliness an appeal from a mid-probate order that denies appellants’ claim — as unintentionally omitted children — to a statutory share of decedent’s estate.1 Today’s opinion reasons that the order in contest is interlocutory2 and hence must be appealed,3 if at *444all, within thirty days of its rendition4 rather than thirty days after its filing5 I must recede from the court’s pronouncement. I would review the nisi prius order at once because it is final as the disposition of a “collateral"…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.