Legal Opinion

Purnell v. Wolffe

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided August 3, 1964No. 2826PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Chudoff, J.,

In this workmen’s compensation case the referee and the board both found in favor of claimant and awarded her compensation based upon total disability. Therefore, the only question before us is whether there was sufficient evidence in the record to sustain the findings of fact and the award as made: Gouldner v. Seltzer Coal Co., 190 Pa. Superior Ct. 115 (1959); Cunningham v. Guerina, 188 Pa. Superior Ct. 288 (1958). It has well been established by our appellate courts that the board is the final fact finding body and its findings of fact will not be set aside unless there was a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Unora v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Paulin v. Williams Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Cunningham v. GuerrinaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Cohen v. Doubleday & Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Walker v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Purnell v. WOLFFESuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API