Legal Opinion
Henry Lochte Co. v. Lefevre
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided February 27, 1911No. 18,165PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from Twenty-First Judicial District 'Court, Parish of West Baton Rouge; L. B. -Claiborne, Judge. Action by the Henry Lochte Company, Limited, against Victor M. Lefebvre and another, intervener and third opponent. Judgment for intervener and third opponent, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.
This case was remanded for the restricted purpose of enabling the parties to adduce further evidence on the issue of privilege vel non claimed by the plaintiff; the court saying:
“The evidence is not sufficiently certain to enable us to determine what necessary plantation supplies were advanced by the plaintiff to the defendant to enable him to make a crop of sugar ■on his plantation.” See 124 La. 255-256, 50 South. 30.
The cause was tried anew on this issue, •and there was judgment in favor of the intervener and third opponent. Plaintiff has •appealed.
On the second trial of the case, no…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Henry Lochte Co. v. LefebvreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
- Stafford v. PearsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1874
- Succession of DrysdaleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
- Wallace v. UrquhartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1871
3Cited by3 opinions
- Clise v. PruntyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1932
- Broussard-Labry Inc. v. People's Bank & Trust Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Dantoni v. DistefanoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932