State v. Upshaw
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Brogan, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Raymond Upshaw, appeals from a trial court decision ordering that he could be forcibly medicated by Twin Valley Behavioral Health Care (“Twin Valley”). In support of the appeal, Upshaw presents the following assignments of error:
{¶ 2} “I. Because the trial court failed to make the requisite findings pursuant to Sell v. United States [539 U.S. 166, 123 S.Ct. 2174, 156 L.Ed.2d 197 (2003) ], the trial court erred to the Defendant-Appellant’s prejudice in granting the petition to forcefully medicate and must be reversed.
{¶ 3} “II. Because Twin Valley…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Washington v. HarperSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Sell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. UpshawOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. Brewer, Ca2008-04-040 (12-1-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. LanierOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- State v. JeffersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- State v. DemarciaOhio Court of Appeals · 2023