Legal Opinion

State v. Upshaw

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 7, 2006No. 2005-CA-64PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brogan, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Raymond Upshaw, appeals from a trial court decision ordering that he could be forcibly medicated by Twin Valley Behavioral Health Care (“Twin Valley”). In support of the appeal, Upshaw presents the following assignments of error:

{¶ 2} “I. Because the trial court failed to make the requisite findings pursuant to Sell v. United States [539 U.S. 166, 123 S.Ct. 2174, 156 L.Ed.2d 197 (2003) ], the trial court erred to the Defendant-Appellant’s prejudice in granting the petition to forcefully medicate and must be reversed.

{¶ 3} “II. Because Twin Valley…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Washington v. HarperSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Sell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. UpshawOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. Brewer, Ca2008-04-040 (12-1-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. LanierOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. State v. JeffersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. State v. DemarciaOhio Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API