Interpace Corp. v. Board of Commissioners

CHARLES SCHWARTZ, Jr., District Judge.

This matter came on for non-jury trial on a former day. At the conclusion of trial the case was submitted for further review by the Court. Now, having carefully considered the evidence adduced at trial, the memoranda and oral argument of counsel, and the applicable law, and for the reasons hereinafter set out, it is the opinion of the Court that judgment should issue in favor of defendant and against plaintiff dismissing plaintiff’s claim at its cost and prejudice.

To the extent that any of the following findings of fact constitute conclusions of law, they…