Legal Opinion · Dissent

Vansant v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 31, 1994No. S93G1407Published

1DissentHunstein, Justice

I respectfully dissent to Division 2 of the majority opinion. The *322evidence at trial admits of several factors that came into play in the Albany police officer’s decision to conduct an investigatory stop of Vansant’s vehicle in order to locate a specific person. Those factors are: the particular description of the vehicle involved in the hit-and-run as a white van; the van’s presence less than a mile from the restaurant minutes after the incident had been reported; the sparsity of any other vehicles in the area at 1:30 a.m. in Albany; and the van’s passage along a major route leading from the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cobb v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  2. State v. McFarlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  3. Cheatham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  4. McConnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API