Legal Opinion

Hornak v. Hornak

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1979PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Arthur D. Spatt, J.

In December, 1976, Rudolph Hornak, a New York Telephone Company employee for the previous 10 years, died. He is survived by his wife of seven years, Marianne (defendant *336herein), and by his father, John Hornak (plaintiff herein). By his death there became due $18,000 in proceeds from Metropolitan Life Insurance Group Policy No. 18007-G, as amended, which insurance coverage had been, since 1970, provided to the deceased as a fringe benefit requiring no contribution.

Plaintiff and defendant each claim that they are the sole beneficiaries of the life…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. SterlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  2. Voros v. BarnaCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Amex Assurance Co. v. CaripidesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  2. New York Life Insurance v. AgeeDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API