Hornak v. Hornak
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Arthur D. Spatt, J.
In December, 1976, Rudolph Hornak, a New York Telephone Company employee for the previous 10 years, died. He is survived by his wife of seven years, Marianne (defendant *336herein), and by his father, John Hornak (plaintiff herein). By his death there became due $18,000 in proceeds from Metropolitan Life Insurance Group Policy No. 18007-G, as amended, which insurance coverage had been, since 1970, provided to the deceased as a fringe benefit requiring no contribution.
Plaintiff and defendant each claim that they are the sole beneficiaries of the life…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. SterlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Voros v. BarnaCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935
3Cited by2 opinions
- Amex Assurance Co. v. CaripidesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- New York Life Insurance v. AgeeDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992