Legal Opinion

Hunt v. American Radiator Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 15, 1896Published

Appeal by the plaintiff, Nathaniel N. Hunt, from an interlocutory judgment oí the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Erie on the Ith day of June, 1895, upon the decision of the court, rendered after a trial at the Erie Special Term, sustaining the several demurrers of each of the defendants to the plaintiff’s complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs on the opinion of Spring, J;, delivered at Special Term, with leave to amend the complaint upon payment of costs of the demurrer and of this appeal.

All concurred.

The opinion of Spring, J., u as as follows:

Denuded of verbiage the complaint is as follows : It alleges that one Bryant had invented a tapping machine and method for cutting *36screw threads; that he asssigned, one-half interest in this unpatented - device to the plaintiff; that the defendants Bond and Pierce* who .were co-partners, entered into an agreement with 'said plaintiff, whereby the said defendants…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brinkerhoff v. BrownNew York Court of Chancery · 1822
  2. Nichols v. . DrewNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Goff v. AkersThe Superior Court of New York City · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API