Steinfur Patents Corp. v. Meyerson
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
On a default by the defendants the plaintiff entered a decree of infringement of patent. This motion is to- set aside that decree. An order was entered below denying the motion to set aside the decree entered.
*766 This appeal is not from the decree, but from the order. Discretionary orders are not appealable. Roemer v. Bernheim, 132 U. S. 103, 10 S. Ct. 12, 33 L. Ed. 277; Dean v. Mason, 20 How. 198, 15 L. Ed. 876; Mobile Shipbuilding Co. v. Federal Bridge &. S. Co., 280 F. 292 (C. C. A. 7); Connor v. Peugh’s Lessee, 18 How. 394, 15 L. Ed. 432; Cambuston v. United States, 95 U. S. 285, 24 L. Ed.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Roemer v. BernheimSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Connor v. Peugh's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Zadig v. ætna Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Roemer v. NeumannSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Dean v. MasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mohonk Realty Corporation v. Wise Shoe StoresCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Miller v. Pyrites Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934