Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In Re Shafer

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 17, 1995No. A94A2187Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partAndrews, Judge

I agree with the majority’s conclusion that this case involved summary adjudication and punishment for direct criminal contempt. As the majority states: “During trial, a trial judge has the power, *728when necessary to maintain order in the courtroom, to declare conduct committed in his presence and observed by him to be contemptuous, and, after affording the contemnor an opportunity to speak in his or her own behalf, to announce punishment summarily and without further notice or hearing.” Dowdy v. Palmour, 251 Ga. 135, 141-142 (304 SE2d 52) (1983).

I further agree that, because the trial court’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dowdy v. PalmourSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. Garland v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  3. Garland v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  4. Spruell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  5. In Re AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API