Legal Opinion

Foster v. Trimble

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 1885PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Moberly Court of Common Pleas, Hon. G-. H. Burcehartt, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Philips, P. J.

The appellant has failed to comply with the letter or the spirit of the statute, or rule fifteen of this court. He *395has not filed any assignment of errors, nor has he filed any abstract of the record. He has simply filed a statement of what he conceives to be the important matters to be determined; bnt there is no abstract of the record, none of the evidence is given, nor a single instruction, nor anything constituting the record, or excerpts therefrom. The rule of court can not be evaded in this way. If the amount involved is too trifling to justify a compliance with…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Goodson v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Aultman & Taylor Co. v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Bank of Tipton v. DavidsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. State ex rel. Cox v. PaceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Coffey v. DuboisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API