Legal Opinion

Olympic View-Mukilteo Action Group v. City of Mukilteo

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1982No. 48147-4PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStafford, J.

We are asked to decide whether the City of Mukilteo's issuance of a building permit for a condominium project on land recently annexed by the City violated the land use laws of the City and State. We hold the build*708ing permit was properly issued and affirm the trial court.

Respondent Mountain Pacific Development Company acquired a 4.9-acre tract of land which, at the time of acquisition, was part of Snohomish County and was zoned for multifamily development (zoning classification MR). In 1978, Mountain Pacific applied to Snohomish County for a building permit to build a 97-unit multifamily…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beshore v. Town of Bel AirCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. Westwood Development Company v. City of AbileneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  3. Williams v. Village of Deer ParkOhio Court of Appeals · 1946
  4. Hawkins v. Louisville & Jefferson County Planning & Zoning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Citizens for Mount Vernon v. Mount VernonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Citizens for Mount Vernon v. City of Mount VernonWashington Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API