Legal Opinion

Herskowitz v. Herskowitz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 12, 1985No. 84-1095PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Finding that the chief administrative judge exceeded his administrative authority in ruling that the parties could not *9represent themselves, we quash the order requiring petitioners to appear only through counsel. See Carr v. Grace, 321 So.2d 618 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), cert. denied, 348 So.2d 945 (Fla.1977) (trial judge erred in ordering appellant to be represented by counsel or be subject to dismissal of her cause); § 454.18, Fla.Stat. (1983). This matter was not cognizable by an administrative judge whose duties are limited to certain internal court proceedings, such as the assigning and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fickle v. AdkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Shotkin v. CohenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  3. Mayflower Investment Co. v. BrillSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  4. QUAY DEV. v. Elegante Bldg. Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1981
  5. Carr v. GraceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rodriguez-Diaz v. AbateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. MARINA BAY RESORT CONDOMINIUM ASSOC., INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  3. Berlant v. National Bank of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Isaaih X Ash v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API