Legal Opinion

Turner v. J. Blach & Sons, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 18, 1941No. 6 Div. 889PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN,-Justice.

The action was for malicious prosecution in the institution of a civil suit.

This court has aligned itself with the courts of other jurisdictions holding such action may be maintained, although no attachment of the person or seizure of property was had in the suit complained of. Peerson v. Ashcraft Cotton Mills et al., 201 Ala. 348, 78 So. 204, L.R.A.1918D, 540. See, also, Glidden Co. et al. v. Laney, 234 Ala. 475, 175 So. 296; 34 Am.Jur. p. 708, and note 15.

The sole question for review on this appeal is a ruling sustaining defendant’s demurrers to Count “A” of the complaint.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Glidden Co. v. LaneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Peerson v. Ashcraft Cotton MillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Boothby Realty Co. v. HaygoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  2. Liberty Loan Corp. of Gadsden v. MizellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  3. Barrett Mobile Home Transport, Inc. v. McGuginSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Petrich v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Evans v. ALA. PROF. HEALTH CONSULTANTSSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API