Legal Opinion
Murray v. Principal Financial Group, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 27, 2010No. 09-16664PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:
The plaintiff in this case, Patricia Murray, is a “career agent” for the defendants, Principal Financial Group, Inc., Principal Life Insurance Company, and Princor Financial Services Corporation (collectively “Principal”). Murray and other Principal career agents sell Principal products that include a wide range of financial products and services, including annuities, disability income, 401 (k) plans, and insurance. Murray sued Principal for sex discrimination in violation of Title VII. The only issue before us is whether Murray is an “employee” within the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lutcher v. Musicians Union Local 47Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Adcock v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- John Weary v. William S. CochranCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Loomis Cabinet Company v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission, and Lynn Martin, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Felder v. USTACourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
- Eeoc v. Global Horizons, IncCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Ruggiero v. American United Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- David Henry v. Adventist Health Castle Med.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Chamberlain v. Securian Financial Group, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2016
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.