Legal Opinion

Hagan v. Commonwealth

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 2018No. 2018-SC-000084-DGPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUSTICE VENTERS

Appellants in this eminent domain action1 all own a fee simple undivided fractional interest in a tract of land taken by the Commonwealth of Kentucky for a highway construction project. They appealed the jury verdict establishing the "just compensation"2 paid for property to be taken. However, upon motion of the Commonwealth, the Court of Appeals dismissed their appeal because Appellants' notice of appeal failed to include the name of Edward Gravell (Edward).

Edward is the husband of Appellant Rose Mary Gravell, one of the tenants-in-common owning the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Devondale v. StallingsKentucky Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Browning v. PreeceKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Mulligan v. MulliganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  4. Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1964
  5. Riley v. Commonwealth, Department of HighwaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1963

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Charles F. Mahl v. Louanne MahlKentucky Supreme Court · 2023
  2. Louanne Mahl v. Charles F. MahlKentucky Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API