Legal Opinion

McKinney v. . Dill

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 25, 1948Published

1Per curiam

At tbe close of plaintiff’s evidence tbe defendants moved for judgment of nonsuit. Tbe trial judge, without ruling on tbe motion, expressed tbe view that tbe plaintiff’s evidence did not in some respects correspond with her complaint, and in bis discretion and ex mero motu withdrew a juror and ordered a mistrial, with permission to tbe plaintiff to amend her complaint. Tbe defendants appealed, for that tbe court failed to rule on their motion to nonsuit, and plaintiff likewise appealed on account of tbe statement by tbe court that tbe plaintiff’s complaint needed amendment to conform to tbe…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Pilot Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Ten'broeck v. . OrchardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API