Opinion No. (1997)
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
1Opinion of the Court
Dear Executive Director Coleman,
¶ 0 This office has received your request for an official Opinion asking, in effect, the following question:
Is 27A O.S. Supp. 1996, § 2-10-308[27A-2-10-308] which sets standards forthe issuance of a "certificate of need" for a biomedical wastedisposal facility unconstitutionally vague?
¶ 1 There are two ways in which a lack of specificity may render a statute unconstitutional: (1) it may amount to a unconstitutional delegation of legislative power to the executive branch, Democratic Party of Oklahoma v. Estep, 652 P.2d 271 (Okla. 1982), or (2) it may give…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mrs. Lola Hornsby v. Ivan Allen, Mayor of the City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Levine v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Oklahoma Ass'n for Equitable Taxation v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.