People v. Thomas
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lorenz
Following a jury trial defendant was convicted of murder and attempt armed robbery. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 38, pars. 9—1, 8—4.) He was sentenced to a term of 25 to 40 years. On appeal he contends that his conviction must be reversed because he was not proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. In the alternative, he contends he should be granted a new trial because, (1) his motion for a substitution of judges was denied, and (2) the State’s closing argument was improper and highly prejudicial. Defendant also urges that his sentence is excessive.
Because we reverse and remand for a new trial,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The PEOPLE v. KostosIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. LagardoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
- People v. EhrlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
- The PEOPLE v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
- People v. FlowersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. MassarellaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- People v. SamplesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- People v. McDuffeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- People v. OatisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.