Legal Opinion

People v. Thomas

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 10, 1978No. 77-673PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lorenz

Following a jury trial defendant was convicted of murder and attempt armed robbery. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 38, pars. 9—1, 8—4.) He was sentenced to a term of 25 to 40 years. On appeal he contends that his conviction must be reversed because he was not proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. In the alternative, he contends he should be granted a new trial because, (1) his motion for a substitution of judges was denied, and (2) the State’s closing argument was improper and highly prejudicial. Defendant also urges that his sentence is excessive.

Because we reverse and remand for a new trial,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. The PEOPLE v. KostosIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  2. People v. LagardoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  3. People v. EhrlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  4. The PEOPLE v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  5. People v. FlowersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. MassarellaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  2. People v. SamplesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  3. People v. McDuffeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. People v. OatisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API