Haberly v. Farmers' Mutual Fire Relief Ass'n

On the Merits

(293 P. 590)

In view of the record, the questions for review on this appeal are very limited. No assignments of error have been made by reason of the admission or rejection of testimony. No exceptions were taken to the instructions of the court. The motion for a new trial was not presented to the trial court for disposal.

KELLY, J.

In this state of the record, we have only to decide whether the complaint supports the verdicts and judgment : Marks v. First National Bank, 84 Or. 601 (165 P. 673).

The complaint alleges that defendant made, issued and delivered to plaintiff’s ward, W. J.…