Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Harvey
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided February 15, 1966No. Civ. No. 64-C-12-LPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARKSDALE, District Judge.
Pursuant to the mandate of the Court of Appeals on the remand of this case to this court, N. L. R. B. v. Harvey, 4 Cir., 349 F.2d 900, a full evidentiary hearing was held on February 9, 1966, to enable this court to determine whether or not an attorney-client relationship existed which justified the refusal of respondent, E. Bruce Harvey, to obey the subpoena duces tecum heretofore issued and: served on him by the National Labor Re- ’ lations Board.
In compliance with Rule 52(a), F.R. Civ.P., this Court does hereby find the facts specially and state separately its…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- National Labor Relations Board v. E. Bruce HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
- O. T. Link, D/B/A Danville Detective Agency v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- National Labor Relations Board v. HarveyDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1964
- National Labor Relations Board v. HarveyDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1966
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Jesse J. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena United States of America v. Under SealCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Strojnik v. Portola Hotel, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.