Legal Opinion
Cinevision Corporation, a Corporation, Wolf and Rissmiller Concerts, a Corporation v. City of Burbank, a Municipal Corporation of the State of California, and Jim Richman, Cinevision Corporation, a Corporation, and Wolf and Rissmiller Concerts, a Corporation v. City of Burbank, a Municipal Corporation of the State of California and Jim Richman, Cinevision Corporation, a Corporation, and Wolf and Rissmiller Concerts, a Corporation v. City of Burbank, a Municipal Corporation of the State of California and Jim Richman, Cinevision Corporation, a Corporation, Wolf and Rissmiller Concerts, a Corporation v. City of Burbank, a Municipal Corporation of the State of California, and Jim Richman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 18, 1984No. 83-5606Published
1Opinion of the Court
745 F.2d 560
53 USLW 2234
CINEVISION CORPORATION, a corporation, Plaintiff,
Wolf and Rissmiller Concerts, a corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF BURBANK, a Municipal Corporation of the State of
California, and Jim Richman, Defendants-Appellees.
CINEVISION CORPORATION, a corporation, and Wolf and
Rissmiller Concerts, a corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
CITY OF BURBANK, a Municipal Corporation of the State of
California and Jim Richman, Defendants-Appellants.
CINEVISION CORPORATION, a corporation, and Wolf and
Rissmiller Concerts, a corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
CITY OF BURBANK, a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited85 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.