State v. Serna
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOSSON, Justice.
In a prosecution for trafficking imitation controlled substances — in this case, baking soda packaged to look like cocaine — the New Mexico Imitation Controlled Substances Act allows the jury to consider evidence of any prior criminal convictions of the accused “related to controlled substances or fraud.” See NMSA 1978, § 30-31A-2(D)(5) (1983). On the other hand, our Rules of Evidence conscientiously restrict any evidentiary use of prior bad acts including criminal convictions. See Rules 11-404(B) NMRA; -403 NMRA. To avoid any conflict, we apply the state statute…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. TollardoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
- Ammerman v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. BelangerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. ElinskiNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. AstorgaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. LopezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. LopezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. SchwartzNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. AcostaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.