Legal Opinion

State v. Serna

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 2013No. Docket 33,021PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOSSON, Justice.

In a prosecution for trafficking imitation controlled substances — in this case, baking soda packaged to look like cocaine — the New Mexico Imitation Controlled Substances Act allows the jury to consider evidence of any prior criminal convictions of the accused “related to controlled substances or fraud.” See NMSA 1978, § 30-31A-2(D)(5) (1983). On the other hand, our Rules of Evidence conscientiously restrict any evidentiary use of prior bad acts including criminal convictions. See Rules 11-404(B) NMRA; -403 NMRA. To avoid any conflict, we apply the state statute…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. TollardoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Ammerman v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. BelangerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. ElinskiNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. AstorgaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. State v. LopezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. State v. LopezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. State v. SchwartzNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. State v. AcostaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API