Legal Opinion

Elder v. Woodruff Hardware & Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 23, 1917No. 7869PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Trover; from city court of Jefferson—Judge Mehaffey. August ’ 23, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtBeoodworth, J.

“The first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed by the Court of Appeals unless the plaintiff in error shows that the law and the facts require the verdict notwithstanding the judgment of the presiding judge. Civil Code (1910), § 6204; Hughes v. Atlanta Steel Co., 9 Ga. App. 510 (71 S. E. 934), and cases cited. This rule applies though two new trials have been granted, one to the plaintiff and the other to the defendant. Jordan v. Dooly, 129 Ga. 392 (58 S. E. 879). In this case the bill of exceptions and the record fail to show that the verdict rendered was demanded by the law and the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jordan v. DoolySupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Butler v. SansoneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  3. Hughes v. Atlanta Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  4. Owens v. CocroftCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jones v. J. S. H. CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API